September 3, 2010

New Google AdWords Interface First Impressions

Over the last couple weeks I’ve been using the Beta version of the new AdWords interface. Most people now have access so I thought I would give my 2 cents.

What I Like

  • Navigation – Getting around your account is faster and easier now. The left side navigation allows you to go to any ad group in any campaign at any time. Add in the tabbed navigation in the center section and you can see pretty much any info you want with a click or two.
  • In-line Editing – I’ve always been annoyed at the number of pages you had to go through to make a simple edit to an ad, keyword bid, etc. Now you just click the appropriate item (which you navigated too rather quickly) and edit. Very helpful.
  • Integrated Reports – One of the most underutilized reports in AdWords in the search query report (I mentioned this in one of my Deadly Sins of AdWords posts here). Google must have noticed because now, when in the Keywords tab, you can just click the “See Search Terms” drop-down box and generate it right in the interface. Brilliant!
  • Graphs – For those of you who like visuals (or have bosses who like visuals) now AdWords has pretty graphs like Analytics to allow you to see key statistics at a glance.

My Complaints

  • Columns – The ability exists to edit which columns you see, but I was a little bugged by the fact that I had to change the columns for every tab (Ads, Keywords, Networks, etc.) separately. If I don’t want to see the many-per-click conversions for Keywords, would I want to see them for Ads? I say no.
  • Width – This issue is somewhat related to the columns, but for archaic PPC managers like myself who still only have one monitor (in my defense it is 22″) the new AdWords interface requires me to have the browser set to full screen. Otherwise I must use the dreaded side scroll.

Overall I understand this is a beta product and is still being fine-tuned. For now I give the new AdWords Interface a B+. No doubt Google will get to an A+ product since AdWords is the cash machine that powers Google and they are doing everything possible to make spending ad dollars easier for advertisers. I’m considering putting together a couple of how-to videos for using the new interface but I want to gauge interest. Leave a comment of what you would like to see.

Direct Mail #Fail

feel-topless

The other day my 28 year-old friend received a direct mail piece from Haband. For those of you unfamiliar with the brand, they provide clothing and shoes for retirement-aged men. So what do you think when you see this ad?

Haband Socks

I don’t know about you, but socks weren’t the first thing that came to mind.

Why I Don’t Trust Google and You Shouldn’t Either!

Okay, I have always had a healthy skepticism of Google, especially relating to AdWords. I set all my campaigns to rotate ads instead of optimize. One reason is to test more accurately and the other is simple suspicion that Google is really just optimizing their bottom line, not my results. And lest you attribute my suspicion to mere paranoia, I submit the following evidence:

Exhibit A

These stats were taken from a client’s account yesterday and covers the month of April. Keep in mind that this campaign is set to rotate ads evenly. A screenshot is not provided to protect privacy.

  • Ad #1 – Served 68% of the time with a 1.45% CTR
  • Ad #2 – Served 32% of the time with a 1.32% CTR

Obviously Google is serving Ad #1 more frequently to help me get more clicks. Any idiot can see it gets a better CTR. However…

  • Ad #1 – Receives a 4.01% conversion rate at a $7.48 cost/conversion
  • Ad #2 – Receives a 6.37% conversion rate at a $4.85 cost/conversion

Now we see Google’s true colors. They aren’t optimizing to help me, they’re optimizing to help themselves and I have a hard time believing that Google’s engineers can’t program the ad optimization algorithm (which technically shouldn’t be messing with this ad group because it is set to rotate) to have conversion statistics override click-through rates.

So there you have it judge. I rest my case.

Technorati Profile

Twitter Tirade: Artificially Pumping Your Follower Count

If you haven’t heard Twitter is really popular these days. So popular in fact that we now see accounts with over 1 million followers (congrats to @aplusk for winning the battle). So popular that even Oprah, goddess of soccer moms, mommy bloggers and mompreneurs, featured the service on her show and tweeted her first tweet live on the show (reminds me of The Truman Show when they show Truman’s first steps, first kiss, etc. live on TV).

The Popularity Contest That Is Now Twitter

Just like any real-life social scene there will always be the annoying boys & girls who feel it their life mission to be “popular”. In Twitter this means getting as many followers as possible. Somehow they derive satisfaction from knowing that thousands of people are aware of who their favorite character is on The Hills or how much they hate going to work on Mondays.

To these people I say “Quit following me!” Your tweets are worthless to an exponential degree. We have no common interests. I don’t want to learn how to make money in my pajamas working from home. I don’t want to join your MLM company. And I know that in 3 days you’ll unfollow me because I had the audacity to not follow you back. The nerve!

Who I Do Want To Follow

As I’ve gotten more and more followers I have become more selective in who I follow. I want relationships and engagement. If I met you in person I would want to know at least one thing about you (that isn’t common knowledge) so we could have a conversation. Common hobbies, work interests or a random funny link. Something! Also, I love following people who @ me. I appreciate the fact they went out of their way to initiate a conversation so there is a surefire way to get me to follow you (but make it good).

Don’t misunderstand, I love my 800+ followers. I try every day to tweet something interesting and valuable. I know it won’t be interesting or valuable to everyone, but I guarantee it will be interesting and valuable to someone. So if you find me interesting I would love to have you follow me. If I find you interesting I will be happy to follow you too.

3 Reasons Yahoo SHOULD Sell Search to Microsoft

Dear Carol Bartz (or your assistant who actually might look at what people are saying about the company),

Congratulations on being named CEO of Yahoo. With the numerous stories published about Yahoo I am grateful that the compulsory CEO head shot features your pleasant smile instead of Jerry’s goofy smile. If not for the reports that you swear like a sailor I could almost visualize you bringing a plate of fresh baked cookies to the boardroom for meetings.

Now I realize that you have a pretty major monkey on your back courtesy of Mr. Yang. Everybody knows that the Microsoft offer last year would have been stealing money, but unfortunately Jerry didn’t take it. Now Microsoft is knocking on the door with a much less attractive deal. However, I believe that selling search is in your best interest, and I’ll give you 3 reasons why:

Why Yahoo Should Sell Search

  1. Improved Interface – Ask any PPC manager handling Google, Yahoo and MSN and they’ll tell you that your interface is the hardest to use.
  2. Desktop Editor – Presuming that you actually want your advertisers to have large accounts that spend lots of money, the Microsoft adCenter Desktop will let those advertisers easily handle large accounts (myself included).
  3. Money – Microsoft is already dumping millions into search to compete. You still have nearly 20% of search and Microsoft will pay dearly to become a legitimate competitor in the space.

So there you have it Carol. Have an intern or assistant pretty that up with a nice slide deck and you’re ready to pitch to the board.

Best Regards,

Robert Brady

PPC Wizard

Bad Economy? Help People Out

Everyone is being inundated with “news” about the bad economy. In some ways this is good. I see a lot more people biking to work and around town as well as more people using public parks for recreation (myself included). That’s great news. However, I also sense a lot of fear, especially amongst my friends who are just starting their careers.

My Friend

Last night I was chatting with a friend on Facebook. Pretty typical stuff about work, life, etc. When we were talking about her job she mentioned that she was looking for a better job but felt like she couldn’t find much out there. I could have offered a few consoling words and left it at that, but instead I thought “Hmmm. What can I do to help?”

My Network

I don’t mean to brag, but I realize that with just over 850 followers on Twitter I have more than the average bear. Amongst those is a cool guy who I know works in PR. I send over a DM and ask him if he knows about anyone looking for an ambitious, young PR person. (Keep in mind that the discussion with my friend and the Twitter DMs are happening simultaneously.) A couple minutes later I get a DM back asking for her resume that he can send along to a couple people. I hit my friend on Facebook chat and she emails me her resume. I forward it along and within just a few minutes her resume is in the hands of a well-connected PR guy who’s looking to pass it around to see if there’s any interest.

Okay, this story doesn’t have a happy ending yet and in no way do I want anyone to feel I’m showing off. This experience just reinforced a very simple principle I’ve been thinking about lately. The quickest way for us to get out of this recession is if we help each other out. Everyone has skills and connections, we just need to use them more often to help others. It can be as simple as getting a resume to new contacts or as complicated as setting up a non-profit. So what are you doing to help people out?

Twitter Tirade: Abusing #FollowFriday

Anyone who has been on Twitter longer than 7 days has come across the #followfriday hashtag. Initially one may think it’s a misspelling. Perhaps some sort of technology problem caused by Twitter (cough, fail whale, cough). However, soon enough each Twitterer will learn that #followfriday is how you recommend someone you follow to all of your followers. The Twitter equivalent of introducing your friend when they arrive at a party. Though clumsily implemented, the concept is brilliant.

How Did It Go Wrong?

I now cringe while booting up my TweetDeck each Friday knowing that I will be deluged for the next few hours by a constant stream of worthless #followfriday recommendations. You know what I’m talking about. 140 characters worth of @RandomNewFollower @MyBuddy @ClientTwitterAccount @Girlfriend/BoyfriendWhoSucksAtTwitter followed by/preceded by #followfriday with the hope of pumping up the follower count of the aforementioned Tweeple.

But what is wrong with that you say? These are my friends/clients/followers and I really do think you should follow them.

Okay.

Great.

But why? Why should I follow these people? I know you only have 140 characters, but throw me a bone here. Tell me that @RandomNewFollower is an awesome mountain biker. Tell me that @MyBuddy is the best Guitar Hero drummer you have ever seen. Tell me that @GirlfriendWhoSucksAtTwitter is really into sewing. That way I know that I want to follow @RandomNewFollower because we share an interest in mountain biking and I don’t want to follow @MyBuddy or @GirlfriendWhoSucksAtTwitter. I’m sorry if it hurts your feelings or hurts their feelings when I don’t follow them. Get over it.

How To Fix It

All I ask is for you to put a little thought into your #followfriday tweet and tell me why I should follow the Twitterer you’re recommending. Allow me to demonstrate – “@BuyPlumbing to get great deals on faucets, toilets, sinks & tubs. #followfriday”. See, pretty easy. Not to mention that the followers your friends get will already have a starting point for their conversation. Now go, and sin no more!

Has Ebay Become Irrelevant?

Personally I stopped using Ebay over a year ago because 1) I could sell stuff just as easily on Craigslist without the fees and 2) For the last year or so I was only using their textbook arm (Half.com) for college texts and I graduated. However, with recent events at Ebay I believe they are fast heading toward irrelevancy.

Recent Ebay News

Two major events really got me thinking about this. First, StumbleUpon.com, acquired by Ebay in 2007 during their web 2.0 acquisition binge, was bought back by the co-founders and venture capital. True their traffic has been going down, but the lame reason cited in the official press release, “there were few long-term synergies between the two businesses”, is a nice way of saying “Ebay was stupid to buy StumbleUpon in the first place”.

Second, we have Skype, another misguided acquisition during Yahoo’s pre-Microsoft sellout days, getting released into the wild via an IPO despite reports that Skype’s founders were also looking for funding to buy back their baby.

What Does This Mean For Ebay?

Both of these scenarios demonstrate a vote of no confidence in Ebay’s ability to succeed long term. Skype is in fantastic shape with increasing revenues and a product that is perfectly positioned to take advantage of the increased proliferation of wireless internet devices (smart phones especially, but netbooks and GPS navigation units too) by giving them the ability to make phone calls all over the world for a pittance. StumbleUpon, despite its poor traffic numbers, plays in the “social media” arena and therefore has at least a puncher’s chance at riding the coattails of services like Twitter. In the past these companies wanted to be bought out because Ebay could take the company to the next level (and make the founders filthy rich), but now the founders see that they can do a better job (and get even richer in the process). Ouch! That’s a slap to Ebay’s face.

Returning to the question I posed in the title, yes Ebay is irrelevant to me. I don’t use it anymore and I don’t see any compelling reason I should go back. What do you think?

Verizon Wireless Newsletter – Fail!

verizon

To help you understand where I’m coming from, know that I was NOT an English major in college. I didn’t even take a class from the English department while in college (tested out of freshman English and took my junior writing class from the business school) yet this glaring typo was obvious to me within the first 10 seconds of scanning this email.

verizon wireless typo

My Advice To Verizon

Dear Verizon,
In the future I recommend that you hire a recent college graduate with an English degree to read your newsletters before sending them to thousands of customers. Notice I did not say edit, I said read. Very slowly and very methodically. This simple activity will catch such errors as displayed above. Oh, and you may send my consultation fee for this advice via Paypal. Thank you and have a nice day.

How Much Should PPC Management Cost?

Imagine a small ecommerce website. They started selling widgets 2 years ago and have had positive sales growth every quarter. About a year ago they started using AdWords, adding Yahoo and MSN a few months later. The “marketing guy” has been managing the accounts and the budgets have been growing at an alarming pace. They decide its time to look at hiring an agency to manage their PPC, but what is a reasonable quote? How much should PPC management cost?

How You Pay

Before discussing how much it should cost, we need to look at how agencies charge. It’s not all apples to apples out there.

  • % of Ad Spend – This is the most common billing method out there. Basically an agency charges a percentage (say 7%) that they get paid for their services. For example, you spend $10,000 on clicks, they bill you $700.
  • Pay-For-Performance – A much more novel approach; almost like a partnership or revenue sharing agreement. Payment can be a % of sales, % of profit, or a flat fee for each conversion. If you understand your cost structure and lifetime customer value, this method can work nicely for both parties.
  • Flat Fee – Just what it sounds like, a flat monthly fee based on your account size and complexity. Great for budgeting because you know exactly what PPC management will cost each month.

But Which Is Best?

Like every question in life, it depends. % of Ad Spend is the most common because it is based on old-school media buying principles and is the easiest. However, I feel this is the worst option for 2 reasons. First, when comparing agencies you inevitably base your decision on price without factoring in quality. Second, the agency’s motivation isn’t aligned with your motivation. For the agency to make more money, they just have to pump up your spend (with little regard for results).

Naturally this leads us to Pay-For-Performance. Make the agency a stake-holder by aligning their pay with a metric like leads or revenue. This can work fantastically if you have good analytics and know your margin/cost structure/lifetime customer value. However, be warned that if your site isn’t converting well or you don’t give the agency a large enough piece of the pie, they may lose interest in your PPC and put you on the back burner. Or they may do a great job and drown your business in a flood of leads and sales (and they’ll go crazy if you tell them to slow down).

A flat management fee provides a middle ground. The fee is set, allowing you to stick to your budgets. The agency is motivated to improve because they know that next months check only comes if they delivered results this month. As you may have guessed, this is the billing method my agency employs and we’ve had good success. What has been your experience?