February 5, 2012

Price Anchoring: Are You Doing It?

SEOmoz Pricing

I love reading books that talk about the psychology of buying. There is nothing more fascinating to me than the human mind. Recently I was reading and came across the concept of anchoring. I remembered the term from my marketing classes, but my experience in the internet space gave me a whole new perspective on the topic.

What Is Price Anchoring?

From Wikipedia: “Anchoring and adjustment is a psychological heuristic that influences the way people intuitively assess probabilities. According to this heuristic, people start with an implicitly suggested reference point (the “anchor”) and make adjustments to it to reach their estimate. A person begins with a first approximation (anchor) and then makes adjustments to that number based on additional information.”

In more lay terms, anchoring is comparing one price to another “anchor” price to determine how good of a deal the item is. You go to the store and see tomatoes on sale for $1.49/lb. You know that the farmer down the street sells tomatoes at his stand for $1.00/lb and therefore the store tomatoes don’t seem very cheap to you. However, another shopper sees the $1.49/lb tomatoes in the store and thinks it’s a great deal because the last time they bought tomatoes in the store they were $1.99/lb (and they don’t know about the farmer.) These two customers perceive the price differently because they have different anchors. Anchoring has a large effect on how we perceive value.

What If My Product Is Unique?

For those companies with unique products & services, your customers may have no anchor to help them see the value of your offering. Consider yourself lucky because you have the opportunity to set an anchor for them. Here are two examples:

SEOmoz.com

SEOmoz Pricing

Just below the video and quotes you’ll see the three purchase options: Pro, Pro Plus and Pro Elite. If you want to join SEOmoz and are a cheapskate, you’ll pick Pro. However, for just a little more you could get Pro Plus and it’s nowhere near as expensive as Pro Elite. SEOmoz uses Pro Elite to set the anchor and that makes Pro Plus and Pro look more reasonably priced. I don’t have user data (but I’d love to hear from a Mozzer in the comments) but I would guess that Pro Elite is their smallest customer base. Sure they make more per customer, but even more than that, it improves the value perception for Pro and Pro Plus.

BaseCampHQ.com

BaseCamp Pricing

BaseCamp has some interesting variations. First, they actually make the Plus plan larger so it jumps out and call it their “Most Popular Plan.” Second, they have ordered the options with the highest priced on the left and the lowest priced on the right. Despite these differences we see the same idea of using the Max plan as the anchor. They’re actually making it more explicit since left-to-right reading will have us see the Max plan first.

How To Fix It?

Some of you may only have two offerings and you’re wondering how you can use anchoring? Say your pricing looks like this:

LotusJump Pricing

LotusJump Pro may be the best value, but it looks expensive compared to Basic. What if you were to add a third plan that had increased functionality and a higher price point? This would serve as the anchor and make the Pro plan look that much more appealing.

What do you think?

#CROchat: Talk To Conversion Rate Experts Today

CROchat

If you spend very long talking about conversion rate optimization you’ll quickly come across a few key players. You’ve got Tim Ash, author of Landing Page Optimization and the organizer behind Conversion Conference in May. There is the ion interactive team of Scott Brinker, Anna & Justin Talerico, Megan Leap and company. You’ve got the awesome webinars done by Flint McGlaughlin at MarketingExperiments.com and a great blog at Conversion-Rate-Experts.com. Have you ever wished you could ask the experts a question about your site? Your problems? Now you can.

Introducing #CROchat Every Thursday on Twitter

Time: 1pm-2pm EST, every Thursday
Location: Twitter, just follow the #CROchat hashtag

You know that conversion optimization would greatly help your online efforts, but don’t know where to start? This is your chance to get expert feedback from authorities in the field. Don’t miss out and I’ll see you there!

CROchat

Book Review: Blink

Malcolm Gladwell has become one of my favorite authors because he looks very deeply into the psychology of decision making. Last week I reviewed one of his earlier works, Tipping Point, and today I’ll give you my takeaways from his more recent title, Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking (disclosure: Amazon affiliate link).

The 3 Main Points Made In Blink

  1. “Decisions made very quickly can be every bit as good as decisions made cautiously and deliberately.”
  2. “When should we trust our instincts, and when should we be wary of them?” The book helps you understand that our instincts can misguide us, thus helping us know when to trust and when to question those instincts.
  3. “Our snap judgments and first impressions can be educated and controlled.” This is the crux of expertise. Experts can make a correct decision quickly and accurately because of training and experience. Intuition can be learned.

He presents many examples throughout the book to highlight these points, but I will only mention two. First, he cites a case where the Getty museum purchased a Greek kouros after 14 months of investigation. Scientific analysis and carefully tracing the documentation of the statue indicated that the statue was indeed authentic. However, nearly every expert in the field, upon first seeing the statue, called it a fake. They described their reactions very unscientifically, saying it looked too “fresh” or that they felt a wave of “intuitive repulsion.” Hardly enough to overturn the months-long analysis right? But those first impressions were more correct than the analysis as the kouros turned out to be a fake.

Secondly, he cites the efforts of Brendan Reilly at Cook County Hospital in Chicago starting in 1996. Reilly noticed that heart attack patients were resource-intensive and the method for diagnosing heart attacks was highly unreliable. Brendan found the research of a cardiologist from the 1970′s, Lee Goldman and began implementing a simple decision tree to diagnose heart attack patients. The tree utilized only 4 main criteria: the results of an ECG, is the pain felt by the patient unstable angina, is there fluid in the patient’s lungs and is the patient’s systolic blood pressure below 100. After two years of collecting data, this method proved 70% better at recognizing which patients were actually having a heart attack.

Takeaways

With the Greek kouros, the experts needed only a couple seconds to accurately determine its authenticity (despite the findings of a 14-month investigation). If you could ask your website visitors what they thought of your site after seeing it for only a few seconds, what would they say? Would they trust your site enough to make a purchase? Do they feel your site is spammy? Give it a try. Get 5 people who haven’t seen your website, let them look at it for a couple seconds and then ask them to give their first impressions. If you want more detailed info, hit up a service like UserTesting.com to get more info.

Lastly, Brendan Reilly was able to improve the ability of doctors to correctly diagnose a heart attack by giving them a method that SIMPLIFIED the process. Doctors go to school for years, have your entire medical history and can order hundreds of tests to make an accurate diagnosis. However, at a certain point the additional information actually made them worse at diagnosing heart attacks. How much information are you giving potential customers to “help” them make a decision? How many different choices do they have? Zero in on the factors that really matter and make the decision easier for your prospects.

What do you think?

PS Another book from Malcolm Gladwell that’s worth a read is Outliers: The Story of Success (disclosure: Amazon affiliate link), an interesting look at aberrations from the trend and what we can learn from them.

Google DROPS Their Branding from Ad Planner

DoubleClick Ad Planner logo

DoubleClick Ad Planner logo

Now I have truly seen it all. Last week Google announced that they would be renaming the Google Ad Planner (their tool for making media buys on targeted sites) the DoubleClick Ad Planner. So why am I making a big deal about what seems to be a very trivial name change?

Google Dropped Its Own Brand Name

Google loves to hear it’s own name. Froogle sounded funny, so they renamed it Google Product Search (despite the longer name.) Gmail in the UK? Nope, it’s Google Mail (partially because they lost a lawsuit too.) They even have their own cell phone now, the Google Nexus One. They love putting their name on everything, so when they take their name off of something, it makes me wonder.

Possible Explanations

  1. The tool isn’t doing well and they don’t want a failure to tarnish the Google name.
  2. DoubleClick raised a stink and wanted some love. Maybe the purchase isn’t going as smoothly as we thought?
  3. Google’s brand doesn’t carry much weight in the display industry (and DoubleClick does). Hard to believe, but entirely possible.

All of these are a little out there, so what do you think? Why did Google drop their branding from Ad Planner?