<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Righteous Marketing &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://righteousmarketing.com/category/google/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://righteousmarketing.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:24:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Tyranny of Free</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/the-tyranny-of-free</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/the-tyranny-of-free#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 14:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=1126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As human beings, we have an irrational desire for all things free. We enter contests over and over again to try and win some free prize. We drive miles to get free products from stores, restaurants, etc. We click PPC ads that use the word &#8220;free&#8221; at a higher rate than ads without. We love [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/yes-its-free.jpg"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/yes-its-free.jpg" alt="Free" title="yes-its-free" width="388" height="309" class="alignright size-full wp-image-1135" /></a>As human beings, we have an irrational desire for all things free. We enter contests over and over again to try and win some free prize. We drive miles to get free products from stores, restaurants, etc. We click PPC ads that use the word &#8220;free&#8221; at a higher rate than ads without. We love free, but is free really free?<br />
</p>
<h3>There Ain&#8217;t No Such Thing as a Free Lunch</h3>
<p>
I heard this phrase over and over from my Economics 110 professor and I thought I had a pretty good grasp on the idea. He would explain that even though a consumer might get a free widget, the company still had to pay for the labor &#038; materials to produce the widget, transportation of the widget and distribution. That &#8220;free&#8221; widget cost the company and most smart companies aren&#8217;t just giving stuff away out of benevolence. They are in the business of making money and that &#8220;free&#8221; widget serves a purpose. Gillette is famous for giving away razors to teenage boys for free; because they know that replacement razor purchases will make up for it. Stores offer coupons for &#8220;free&#8221; items because they know you won&#8217;t walk out with just the freebie (nobody wants to look that cheap). But how does this relate to the internet?<br />
</p>
<h3>The Internet &#038; Free: A Match Made in Heaven</h3>
<p>
As my economics professor pointed out, &#8220;free&#8221; items in the physical world have numerous costs that can add up quickly, like manufacturing, shipping, storage, customer service, etc. But somehow the internet changed our perception. Content is only produced once (incurring all the costs) but can be shared an infinite number of times on the internet for free. It&#8217;s like the perfect cloning machine and we&#8217;ve been expanding its cloning ability. Don&#8217;t believe me? Ask the newspaper classified industry or the music business how they feel about the internet.<br />
<br />
Though some businesses and industries have fought the internet tooth and nail to protect their revenue sources, other companies have embraced the internet of free to become multi-billion dollar international behemoths. Probably the most visible today would be Google and Facebook. Whether it&#8217;s free email, free analytics, free image hosting, or free event planning, we got our fix and we&#8217;re hooked on free.<br />
</p>
<h3>Free at What Cost?</h3>
<p>
With Google it started small enough. It was just a couple ads on your search engine results. After awhile we got used to them and started ignoring them. Then Google added some more. We learned to ignore them even better. Google added different formats. You get the picture. There is a constant arms race between Google and search users to make sure we notice ads, we click ads and we have a good experience in the process.<br />
<br />
Facebook is a similar story. At first you could happily poke, post and message to your little heart&#8217;s delight without any of those ugly ads cluttering up your social experience. Then Facebook started showing an ad on certain pages. Then another and another. Pretty soon there wasn&#8217;t a page in Facebook without ads on it. But we were used to it, so we didn&#8217;t complain much. We were too busy checking out that hot girl from the party last night.<br />
</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s In It For Google/Facebook?</h3>
<p>
If you haven&#8217;t checked the stock market lately, Google is worth $204.45 billion as of December 13th, 2011 at 3:10 pm MST. Just one share of GOOG stock is worth over $630. Though Facebook stock isn&#8217;t publicly traded, in <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/facebook/8924901/Facebook-IPO-would-value-each-user-at-125.html">recent IPO rumors</a> the company is estimated to be worth $100 billion. So how do companies that make their business out of giving away stuff for free (search results, email, video, analytics, etc.) turn into multi-billion dollar businesses? As we often hear, follow the money.<br />
<br />
While Google does have a handful of paid products, the vast majority of their revenue is generated through AdWords, their self-serve advertising platform. And Facebook was hemorrhaging cash until they launched their advertising platform. So why does Google and Facebook provide all these cool features for free?<br />
<br />
Advertising Space!<br />
<br />
It seems pretty straightforward and fairly simple, but I feel like sometimes we forget that advertising revenue is the main motivation for many of the decisions being made at Google and Facebook. Two examples come to mind.<br />
<br />
First, I read a post on the Dragon Search blog titled &#8220;<a href="http://www.dragonsearchmarketing.com/googles-new-bubble-ads">Bursting Google’s New Bubble Ads: the Good, the Bad &#038; the Ugly</a>&#8221; by Cassie Allinger. The post does a great job of explaining a new ad placement that Google released without so much as a blog post announcing it. She makes the point that because of this new ad placement inside the info bubble on Google Maps SMBs should now consider advertising here to protect their brand/prevent other brands from advertising inside their info bubble.<br />
<br />
I agree with her entirely and as a PPC professional I would also advise an SMB to advertise here (and advertise on their competitors if possible). I just don&#8217;t agree that SMBs can complain when Google shows an ad next to their FREE Google local business listing. Ads are how Google makes money. That money funds all the freebies.<br />
<br />
Second, I was participating in #ppcchat (a <a href="http://theppcblog.com/tag/ppc-chat/">weekly Twitter chat about the PPC industry</a>) and this question came up &#8220;What is are some things about AdWords that just F&#8217;n piss you off?&#8221; The next few minutes featured a laundry list of complaints from AdWords professionals. We were getting it all off our chest. But as I contrasted it with the first example above, I realized a critical difference &#8211; AdWords advertisers are paying Google. They are Google&#8217;s real customers. They are the ones that drive profits and keep shareholders happy. They have paid for the right to complain.<br />
</p>
<h3>Remember &#8211; Nothing Is Truly Free, Even on the Internet</h3>
<p>
Altruism is exceedingly rare. Therefore, anything offered to you as &#8220;free&#8221; has some component or angle that allows the offering party to make money. Here are a handful of examples:</p>
<ul>
<li>Free email from Gmail &#8211; Ads alongside your emails</li>
<li>Free video hosting from YouTube &#8211; Ads before, after or overlaid on your videos</li>
<li>Free image hosting from Facebook &#8211; Anyone viewing your photos sees ads</li>
<li>Free relationship management tool (aka Facebook) &#8211; Ads when you&#8217;re catching up with your friends</li>
<li>Free analytics from Google &#8211; Seamless integration with AdWords (and a regular email with a coupon for $100 of free advertising in AdWords for new accounts)</li>
<li>Free directions &#038; maps from Google &#8211; Ads again</li>
<li>Free business listing from Google &#8211; Ads on your page, potentially from competitors</li>
<li>Free fan page on Facebook &#8211; Ads</li>
</ul>
<p>
Hopefully you see the pattern here. Many freebies on the internet are driven by advertising revenue. News sites write articles to sell ad impressions. Google will index the entire internet and offer you the best results for your search query so they can show ads. Facebook gives you a platform to stay in touch with friends or promote your business so they can serve ads. This is how these companies pay the bills and until you start paying, stop complaining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/the-tyranny-of-free/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google vs. Bing: The Average User&#8217;s Perspective</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/google-vs-bing-the-average-users-perspective</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/google-vs-bing-the-average-users-perspective#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 19:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lacey reached out to me about writing a guest post and I thought that it would be interesting to see how a non-PPC wizard feels about Google vs. Bing. Below is her experience Many of you may already have your preconceived notions about Google and Bing. Some may even have a preference for one and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Lacey reached out to me about writing a guest post and I thought that it would be interesting to see how a non-PPC wizard feels about Google vs. Bing. Below is her experience</em><br />
<br />
Many of you may already have your preconceived notions about Google and Bing. Some may even have a preference for one and refuse to use the other. Personally, I’ve always used Google, and didn’t really see a reason to switch, but I always wondered exactly what the difference would be. Because I recently got a new puppy, I decided to search for “puppy toys” in each search engine to see which site brought me better results. More specifically, I wanted something that would be good for dogs under one year old that are teething and coping with a new environment.<br />
</p>
<h3>Google</h3>
<p>
When I first entered my keywords into Google’s search box, this is the screen they presented. The top three links are for ads, naturally, because that is how Google makes money, but I also noticed something else. I could barely see their “Shopping” section at the bottom of the screen because so much space is taken at the top. My first instinct was to go to the first item that had my search terms, so I clicked on the third ad.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-SERP.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-SERP-1024x575.png" alt="Google SERP" title="Google-SERP" width="512" height="290" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1107" /></a><br />
<br />
When I clicked on the ad, I was immediately bombarded with loads of information. The print was small and it seemed as if I was really going to have to search for the best toy for my puppy. There were a lot of options, but I think it would have been better if those options were easier to find (i.e. categories like plush dog toys, teething puppy toys, holiday toys, etc.).<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-LP.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Google-LP-1024x575.png" alt="" title="Google-LP" width="512" height="290" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1108" /></a><br />
</p>
<h3>Bing</h3>
<p>
When I searched for my product on Bing, the first thing I noticed was the pictures of the products in the middle of the screen. I now realize that there were also pictures of products in my Google search, but they weren’t as noticeable because they were so far down the screen. Bing has designed their site to help viewers get right to what they need.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Bing-SERP.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Bing-SERP-1024x575.png" alt="Bing SERP" title="Bing-SERP" width="512" height="290" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1109" /></a><br />
<br />
I was very intrigued by their pictures, so I went directly to their shopping section, and it was much easier to narrow down my search with the options to the left, and I was able to find exactly what I was looking for.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Bing-LP.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/Bing-LP-1024x575.png" alt="" title="Bing-LP" width="512" height="290" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-1110" /></a><br />
<br />
<em>Lacey Cook is an author who writes guest posts on the topics of business, marketing, credit cards, and personal finance. Additionally, she works for a website that focuses on educating readers about their  <a href="http://www.firstcreditcardresource.org/">first credit card</a>.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/google-vs-bing-the-average-users-perspective/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Google Promotion Ads</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/new-google-promotion-ads</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/new-google-promotion-ads#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:28:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Promotion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one is surprised when Google products show up as the top result for searches involving Google branded keywords. For example, here is the SERP for a search on the keyword &#8220;google adwords&#8221;: As you can see, Google grants itself the top paid ad (with 4 sitelinks as an added bonus) for this search and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is surprised when Google products show up as the top result for searches involving Google branded keywords. For example, here is the SERP for a search on the keyword &#8220;google adwords&#8221;:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-ad.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-ad.png" alt="Google AdWords SERP" title="Google-ad" width="600" height="275" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-990" /></a><br />
<br />
As you can see, Google grants itself the top paid ad (with 4 sitelinks as an added bonus) for this search and relegates other advertisers to the right sidebar. No big deal. Run searches for other Google tools and you&#8217;ll see similar placement, but they always show up in the <del datetime="2011-02-16T15:15:38+00:00">barely visible,</del> highlighted box that reads &#8220;Ad&#8221; in the upper right hand corner. However, I spotted an interesting result yesterday while searching.<br />
</p>
<h3>Google Promotion &#8211; A New Class of Ad?</h3>
<p>
I was doing some research and using the &#8220;site:&#8221; search functionality in Google. First of all, I was surprised to see an ad at all because I couldn&#8217;t imagine a PPC manager in his right mind that would be bidding on &#8220;site:www.realestateproarticles.com&#8221;. However, if you look in the upper right corner of the highlighted box you&#8217;ll see the &#8220;Google promotion&#8221; text:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-Promotion1.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Google-Promotion1.png" alt="Google Promotion Ad" title="Google-Promotion" width="600" height="100" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-993" /></a><br />
<br />
Obviously this is a different class of ad. But does Google pay for the click like everyone else? Would another advertiser actually show up if they were to bid on this extremely specific phrase? What do you make of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/new-google-promotion-ads/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weird AdWords Layout</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/weird-adwords-layout</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/weird-adwords-layout#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New ad format]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=981</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The other day, a friend of mine ran a search for &#8220;marketing plan software&#8221; and got the following SERP: He sent me the screenshot because he thought that the third ad looked a little odd, and boy was he right. Here is a closer look at the ad in question: You&#8217;ll notice that the highlighted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day, a friend of mine ran a search for &#8220;marketing plan software&#8221; and got the following SERP:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/mps-adwords-title-firstline.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/mps-adwords-title-firstline.png" alt="New AdWords Ad Format" title="mps-adwords-title-firstline" width="600" height="430" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-982" /></a><br />
<br />
He sent me the screenshot because he thought that the third ad looked a little odd, and boy was he right. Here is a closer look at the ad in question:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/weird-ad-format.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/weird-ad-format.png" alt="New AdWords Ad Format Large" title="weird-ad-format" width="602" height="471" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-983" /></a><br />
<br />
You&#8217;ll notice that the highlighted ad shows both the Title <strong>and Line 1</strong> in large blue, underlined text. Then you have Line 2 in the regular small black font and the Display URL is in green. I haven&#8217;t been able to replicate an ad in this format, so I was wondering if anyone else has seen a similar result? What impact do you think this might have on CTR?<br />
<br />
<em>UPDATE: I talked with the advertiser, <a href="http://www.marketing-plan-success.com">Marketing Plan Success</a>, just to confirm that yes, the 1st line of ad copy is what is showing after the hyphen in the title.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/weird-adwords-layout/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More MCC Cosmetic Changes</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/more-mcc-cosmetic-changes</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/more-mcc-cosmetic-changes#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MCC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week Google moved the MCC link and drop-down box up to the top of the screen and now I&#8217;m seeing these cute little icons in their own column of the MCC dashboard. The red one is for critical alerts in your individual client accounts. In this case, a failed payment method. The yellow guy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MCC-cosmetic-change.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/MCC-cosmetic-change.png" alt="MCC interface change" title="MCC-cosmetic-change" width="86" height="243" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-856" /></a><br />
Last week Google <a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/mcc-link-moved">moved the MCC link and drop-down box</a> up to the top of the screen and now I&#8217;m seeing these cute little icons in their own column of the MCC dashboard.<br />
<br />
The red one is for critical alerts in your individual client accounts. In this case, a failed payment method.<br />
<br />
The yellow guy is for the <del datetime="2010-08-18T21:46:08+00:00">annoying</del> less important alerts, such as a campaign that has ended (even though it was set to end and ended right on time).<br />
<br />
Looks like the all-seeing eye of Google has decided to focus its gaze on the MCC interface yet again.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/mordor.jpg"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/mordor.jpg" alt="" title="mordor" width="335" height="255" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-857" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/more-mcc-cosmetic-changes/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PPC Aggregators Are Screwed</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-aggregators-are-screwed</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-aggregators-are-screwed#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As usual, Google continues to change and modify their AdWords platform and policies. The newest change (announced via the AdWords blog) was the topic of a Brad Geddes post on Search Engine Land that very clearly laid out the good and bad of the policy change. However, here is my take: What Changed? A lot [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/screwed.jpg"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/screwed.jpg" alt="PPC Aggregators Screwed" title="screwed" width="400" height="300" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-853" /></a>As usual, Google continues to change and modify their AdWords platform and policies. The newest change (announced via the <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/07/updates-to-how-our-partners-work-with.html">AdWords blog</a>) was the topic of a <a href="http://searchengineland.com/googles-new-forced-transparency-is-your-agency-ready-47498">Brad Geddes post on Search Engine Land</a> that very clearly laid out the good and bad of the policy change. However, here is my take:<br />
</p>
<h3>What Changed?</h3>
<p>
A lot of PPC providers out there take your money and give you back the leads/phone calls that result from the spend. If the results justify the cost they keep paying. However, these aggregators don&#8217;t usually report how much was spent on clicks and how much they pocket for themselves. Hence the policy change.<br />
<br />
Google is just requiring that the end client know how many impressions they got, how many clicks and the total spend. This way the advertiser will know if an agency is pocketing a large chunk or not.<br />
</p>
<h3>Why I Think It&#8217;s A Good Thing</h3>
<p>
In a word: Transparency! Agencies that are afraid to disclose their cut should be culled from the herd. If you&#8217;re good then your clients should be willing to pay the fee because you produce results. Pretty simple if you ask me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-aggregators-are-screwed/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Optimized Ad Serving? I Don&#8217;t Think So</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/optimized-ad-serving-i-dont-think-so</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/optimized-ad-serving-i-dont-think-so#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 13:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[optimize]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rotate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below is a screenshot from a display network campaign that was running for about 16 hours. All the default setting were in place, meaning that ads were set to optimize instead of rotate. So unless Google is omniscient (and the algorithm may be approaching that level) I&#8217;m pretty sure they should have showed the other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Below is a screenshot from a display network campaign that was running for about 16 hours. All the default setting were in place, meaning that ads were set to optimize instead of rotate.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/optimized-ads.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/optimized-ads.png" alt="Optimized ads" title="optimized-ads" width="367" height="307" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-836" /></a><br />
<br />
So unless Google is omniscient (and the algorithm may be approaching that level) I&#8217;m pretty sure they should have showed the other ad at least a little bit before making that determination. Has anyone else seen this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/optimized-ad-serving-i-dont-think-so/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdWords Ads Now in Purple!</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-ads-now-in-purple</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-ads-now-in-purple#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[purple background]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, just run a Google search. Most likely you&#8217;ll see the new light purple background on the ads directly above organic results. It looks like this: Subtle, isn&#8217;t it? On my monitor it&#8217;s so subtle that I didn&#8217;t see it at first glance. However, after sliding Firefox over onto my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you haven&#8217;t seen it yet, just run a Google search. Most likely you&#8217;ll see the new light purple background on the ads directly above organic results. It looks like this:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/adwords-purple-background.png"><img src="http://righteousmarketing.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/adwords-purple-background.png" alt="Adwords Purple Background" title="adwords-purple-background" width="600" height="290" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-829" /></a><br />
<br />
Subtle, isn&#8217;t it? On my monitor it&#8217;s so subtle that I didn&#8217;t see it at first glance. However, after sliding Firefox over onto my laptop screen I saw it more clearly. <a href="http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2010/07/27/google-purple-ads/">Rimm-Kaufman</a> actually got the following quote direct from Google:<br />
<br />
&#8220;Starting today and ramping up to 100% globally by the end of this week, we’ll be changing the background color for ads that appear above the search results on Google.com as well as our local domains. The ads, which currently have a pale yellow background, will change to have a pale purple background. This change is part of the ‘look and feel’ update  to our color palette and logo that we made back in May of this year to keep the Google results page looking fresh and modern. This is purely an aesthetic change to our ads and won’t have any impact on the way we target or serve advertisements on Google.com.&#8221;<br />
<br />
Look and feel? Here&#8217;s why I think they did it?<br />
</p>
<h3>Google Is All About The Money</h3>
<p>
Don&#8217;t forget that Google makes billions of dollars in advertising revenue EVERY MONTH! Even the smallest change can have a huge impact on their bottom line and they test a lot. Based on what I see, this helps the top ads blend into the organic results. That means more people, even ad-averse people, will click on search ads, thus padding Google&#8217;s pockets.<br />
<br />
As a PPC advertiser I like it a lot. Accounts with high QS will get rewarded even further by showing above organic results and getting an even higher CTR. For companies in competitive spaces (where high bids are also needed to hit the top 3) it sucks. They&#8217;ll have to work that much harder to make their PPC work.<br />
<br />
But make no mistake, even though Google says this is &#8220;purely an aesthetic change&#8221;, I&#8217;m sure that dollars and cents made a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-ads-now-in-purple/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AdWords Certified Partner</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-certified-partner</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-certified-partner#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 14:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adwords certified professional]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On a point of personal privilege, I wanted to take the opportunity to announce that Righteous Marketing is now an AdWords Certified Partner. According to Google, &#8220;This qualification demonstrates that the company employs individuals with deep AdWords knowledge, and has experience in assisting clients with their AdWords campaigns.&#8221; The small print says that I&#8217;ve managed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://adwords.google.com/professionals/profile/org?id=03311231001776377076&#038;hl=en"><img src="https://adwords.google.com/professionals/static/resources/adwords_certified_partner-125.gif"></a><br />
<br />
On a point of personal privilege, I wanted to take the opportunity to announce that Righteous Marketing is now an AdWords Certified Partner. According to Google, &#8220;This qualification demonstrates that the company employs individuals with deep AdWords knowledge, and has experience in assisting clients with their AdWords campaigns.&#8221; The small print says that I&#8217;ve managed over $10,000 in spend over the last 90 days and have passed the new, more rigorous certification exams.<br />
<br />
<em>(Imaginary award speech)</em>I&#8217;d like to thank <a href="http://www.paulallen.net/">Paul Allen</a> for getting me started in PPC during my college internet marketing class. I&#8217;d also like to thank Robert Stevens of <a href="http://www.writeexpress.com">WriteExpress</a> for taking me on as an intern and then giving me great experience managing a large PPC account, <a href="http://www.vizad.com">Vizad</a> for letting me manage multiple accounts, and all my current and former clients for trusting me to spend their money (and lots of it) wisely. Oh, and my mom and dad, and my friends, and God for giving me this talent. <em>(Queue music that kicks me off the stage)</em>  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/adwords-certified-partner/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Broad Match Modifiers Now Available in U.S.</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/broad-match-modifiers-now-available-in-u-s</link>
		<comments>http://righteousmarketing.com/broad-match-modifiers-now-available-in-u-s#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 14:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[AdWords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[broad match modifiers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expanded broad match]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=802</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google announced the feature back in May and today the Rimm-Kaufman Group is announcing that broad match modifiers are now available to all US customers. So what&#8217;s the big deal? What are &#8220;Broad Match Modifiers&#8221;? Ever since AdWords went to expanded broad match (that&#8217;s Google-speak for &#8220;we&#8217;ll show you ad if we feel it is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google <a href="http://adwords.blogspot.com/2010/05/new-keyword-targeting-feature-for.html">announced the feature</a> back in May and today the <a href="http://www.rimmkaufman.com/rkgblog/2010/07/14/broad-match-modifiers-are-here">Rimm-Kaufman Group is announcing</a> that broad match modifiers are now available to all US customers. So what&#8217;s the big deal?<br />
</p>
<h3>What are &#8220;Broad Match Modifiers&#8221;?</h3>
<p>
Ever since AdWords went to expanded broad match (that&#8217;s Google-speak for &#8220;we&#8217;ll show you ad if we feel it is within 100 miles of being relevant to a search&#8221;) advertisers have been adding using more phrase match, exact match and negative keywords to avoid less qualified impressions and clicks. Frankly, experts have been bitching about this since it was pushed system wide. Of the <a href="http://righteousmarketing.com/13-deadly-sins-of-adwords-3-carelessness">13 Deadly Sins of PPC</a>, I rank it #3. Broad match modifiers is Google&#8217;s response to all the complaints.<br />
<br />
This visual should help explain, but basically you add a plus sign to let Google know which word(s) are required.<br />
<br />
<img alt="" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_X6aeJvBBv4o/S-ivXfpCLaI/AAAAAAAAAHU/fR3vuNgsV-o/s1600/bmm.jpg" title="AdWords Broad Match Modifier" class="aligncenter" width="487" height="322" /><br />
<br />
Basically, if you add a plus sign in front of every word you can revert to the basic broad match. While most most beginner/intermediate users will go this route, advanced users will continue to test and optimize to find the best combination. I hate on broad match plenty, but Google has a lot of data and may help you discover profitable keywords you might have missed. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://righteousmarketing.com/broad-match-modifiers-now-available-in-u-s/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

