<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A PPC Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:26:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PPC Management Paradox &#124; Righteous Marketing</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>PPC Management Paradox &#124; Righteous Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-791</guid>
		<description>[...] in September I wrote about the paradox of testing vs. granularization and got some great insights from my readers. Today I would like to hear how you PPC managers &amp; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in September I wrote about the paradox of testing vs. granularization and got some great insights from my readers. Today I would like to hear how you PPC managers &amp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-532</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-532</guid>
		<description>Definitely - pivot tables make things so much easier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Definitely &#8211; pivot tables make things so much easier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 16:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-531</guid>
		<description>@Alan - Aggregating data is a great way to go. Do you use pivot tables in Excel to do combine the data?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Alan &#8211; Aggregating data is a great way to go. Do you use pivot tables in Excel to do combine the data?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-529</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-529</guid>
		<description>http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/techniques/keywords-per-ad-group/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/techniques/keywords-per-ad-group/" rel="nofollow">http://www.alanmitchell.com.au/techniques/keywords-per-ad-group/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Mitchell</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-528</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Mitchell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 10:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-528</guid>
		<description>While I agree there are positives and negatives to a highly granular account structure, as I point out in my post on having 1 keyword per ad group...



...I don&#039;t think granularity has to always be at the expense of testing validity. If some of your headlines, ad descriptions and display URLs are the same across multiple ad groups, why not download an ad text report and pool data across ad groups. Yes, it might not be as insightful as looking at each ad group&#039;s keywords and ads in isolation, but surely it&#039;s no worse than having multiple different keywords in the same ad group?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree there are positives and negatives to a highly granular account structure, as I point out in my post on having 1 keyword per ad group&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;I don&#8217;t think granularity has to always be at the expense of testing validity. If some of your headlines, ad descriptions and display URLs are the same across multiple ad groups, why not download an ad text report and pool data across ad groups. Yes, it might not be as insightful as looking at each ad group&#8217;s keywords and ads in isolation, but surely it&#8217;s no worse than having multiple different keywords in the same ad group?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://righteousmarketing.com/ppc-paradox/comment-page-1#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 17:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://righteousmarketing.com/?p=359#comment-527</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a tough call, because granularization is definitely needed to increase QS and performance. However it does take more time to collect &quot;test&quot; data. With small budget campaigns its especially tough.

I think being granular is slightly more important, so I make that my first priority. Then I test as best I can within the smaller groups. I&#039;ll A/B test ads or LP&#039;s common among the smaller adgroups to see if there is any significance as a whole or within the sub groups.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a tough call, because granularization is definitely needed to increase QS and performance. However it does take more time to collect &#8220;test&#8221; data. With small budget campaigns its especially tough.</p>
<p>I think being granular is slightly more important, so I make that my first priority. Then I test as best I can within the smaller groups. I&#8217;ll A/B test ads or LP&#8217;s common among the smaller adgroups to see if there is any significance as a whole or within the sub groups.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
